Talk:Ice-marginal lava flow

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. UtherSRG (talk) 03:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ice–marginal lava flow → Ice-marginal lava flow – I am the one that created this article, but from looking at sources the endash in "Ice–marginal lava flow" is usually replaced with a hyphen. Moving this article from "Ice–marginal lava flow" to "Ice-marginal lava flow" would also follow WP:HYPHEN. Volcanoguy 13:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, if for no other reason that the nominator is evidence that there are users on Wikipedia who can change their mind on an issue based on what they see in sources and admit the possibility that they may have been wrong! Honey, wake up the kids ... ! Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The nom is the only major contributor to the article, so I think we can trust him on this. Also, the en dash just doesn't look right here. Jenks24 (talk) 02:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.