Jump to content

Talk:Ickenham tube station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Least used

[edit]

The reason why it is the least used is data compared to the other stations on the Piccadilly line hence citation needed is not necessary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.244.130 (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autochthony writes: Compare data here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_London_Underground_stations [reviewed today, 22 November 2009]. there are stations on both the Met. amd Piccadilly with lower usage figures now. Perhaps take the 'lowest usage' comment out? Or amend to 'one of the lowest usages'? Autochthony wrote - 1740z, 22 Nov. '09. 86.151.60.238 (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ickenham tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]