Talk:Idempotent (ring theory)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Idempotent (ring theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Redirects[edit]
I think there are probably a whole slew of redirects to those special idempotents that need to be repointed at this page. Appreciate any help! Rschwieb (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 10 June 2016[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover) What's in your palette? Paine 15:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Idempotent element → Idempotent (ring theory) – The article appears to be mainly about idempotents in ring theory. The page Idempotent element can then redirect to what it used to redirect to, Idempotence. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Mild support, looks reasonable. (This probably could have been closed as move as unopposed) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 21:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support: I suppose "idempotent element" can mean any element that is idempotent for some operation, not limited to the ring-theoretical operations. So, the move makes sense. -- Taku (talk) 20:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.