Talk:Immuron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{notability}} {{cite web}}

Chap6595 12:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Can someone tell me if this is no longer a Stud page, more infomation has been added. I believe that this little company deserves some attention, due to its research ect. Well, looks like you did remove the stub template. If you think it's notable then you need to find reliable sources to prove this. Currently most of the information is referenced from the company's own material, which is certainly not an unbiased source. Hence I have re-added the | tag. Rich257 13:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Chap6595 08:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 13:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Fair enough, i will get some more sources. But i think it is quite noteable as they have a anti-body for anthrax and have a 10+ contract with the US and government. But point taken Please check your changes to articles using the preview button before saving the page: your addition of the reference didn't work, as you could have seen if you'd checked the page afterwards. When I last read the links they were researching antibodies for anthrax, they don't have anything useful yet, and may never. 90% of drugs candidates fail and never reach the market. As the US government contract, well they fund research in to so many things, do you think that makes it notable in itself? Rich257 19:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Chap6595 08:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Sorry about the references. I understand that you don't think this is an important company, but i had a research project at University, I don't think there is another drug company that uses as much Bovine Products as Anadis does, that is why I placed this on Wikipedia, becasue trying to search for a bovine drug on the Internet wasn't easy. Plus, the research has shown that Anadis's products descrease the risk of contracting Anthrax by up to 90%, in a study done on mice....now that is a fact that should be available to everyone in the world that we live in today. Chap6595 08:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Rich257, Mate having trouble with references, i think i must be missing something. I put in one more at the top in realation to ASX but now at the bottom the links are coming up with errors. Can you help me find out why it is doing this? Chap6595 13:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Never mind, read your site fixed up links I didn't say that I thought it was non-notable but it was clear that the notability was not demonstrated in the article. I'm sure mice are very excited about the reduced threat from Anthrax, those that weren't killed proving it anyway. You can see the documentation and examples of the usage of the template at |. Rich257 14:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Ok thats fine, are you happy to leave it up for a few more weeks so i can add more links and references to the site? Chap6595 12:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Absolutely, I'd normally leave a notability in tag for some months and then if there's no change think about deleting the article. Rich257 12:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]