Jump to content

Talk:In Touch Weekly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]

In TouchIn Touch Weekly – Correct name of publication. Crumbsucker 13:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Centrxtalk • 03:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Touch Weekly is about to run a satiric front page "Out of Touch Weekly" as a pun to John McCain who graces the front page. Source: VF.com

issaccheriyathu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.249.38 (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Touch used to be the name of a gay magazine

[edit]

i used to get a magazine called In Touch, but it was a softcore gay porn magazine. a quick google search shows one of the covers here. i think it should be mentioned in the article, just to distinguish it from that other magazine. i expected that this article would be about the gay one, so i reckon others might also. badmachine (talk) 22:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In Touch Weekly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]