Jump to content

Talk:Ina Kaplan/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 07:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • Infobox is OK;
  • Short description is appropriate;
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  • the links to nine ball and ten ball are apt; had no idea about these versions of billiards
  • Some of the Billiards area links don't work. Not a show stopper.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Simple and concise coverage of her participation in competition sport.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  • NPOV is presented in this article.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 3 July 2019
  • Page has 108 edits by 17 editors
  • 90 day page views = 111 views, average of 1 view daily
  • Examination of page history shows steadiness and improvements
  • Page is considered stable.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • No images on this page.
  • Lot of images here, but finding free one may be challenging
  1. Overall:
  • A neat, crisp article on a lady billiards player.

 

 Passed GA Status is confirmed. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]