Talk:Incompatibility of quantum measurements

Excellent work![edit]

Thank you for your excellent work! I enjoy it so much!

The article provides a concise and clear explanation of a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It outlines how certain measurements cannot be performed simultaneously with arbitrary precision due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The article effectively introduces the mathematical framework and physical implications of incompatible measurements, making it accessible to readers with a basic understanding of quantum mechanics. Additionally, the references and links to related topics are helpful for those seeking a deeper understanding of the subject. Overall, the article is well-structured and informative. AzzurroLan (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work![edit]

A good work! This article provides a detailed overview of the concept, focusing on the inability to measure certain sets of quantum observables simultaneously with arbitrary precision. This incompatibility arises due to the intrinsic properties of quantum mechanics, specifically the non-commutativity of some operators. JohnWYu (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very good![edit]

I really enjoyed your article. I've just correct a typo on one paragraph title: "...quantum information proessing" to "..information processing". One last thing: I saw that POVMs are in the 'see also' section, even if they are cited in the body of the article. Should a link to the POVM Wikipedia article be put directly the first time you introduce it in the body? Anyway, very good work, I deeply enjoyed it! 77Davide77 (talk) 13:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your review, and I am quite glad that you enjoy it. Concerning the POVM in the 'see also' section, I agree with you that it should be removed provided that there is a already link in the 'Definition' section. Many thanks for your kind remainder. Have a nice day! Daath3 (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great work[edit]

Very interesting topic, you have done a great work! Some little observations:

1) Maybe in the first line of Section "Numerical critria" there are too many "finite". Maybe it is possible to avoid the repetitions, but I didn't change anything since I was worried to modify the sense of the sentence.

2) In the subsection Incompatibility robustness the first line says Incompatibility weight of POVMs is defined by, exactly as it is written in the previous subsection Incompatibility weight.

3) Even if there is a proper reference, while reading I had the feeling you should have provided a brief definition/explanation of "quantum key distribution" and quantum "metrology". CarloSapo97 (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your reasonable suggestions! I will improve the article according to them. Have a nice day! Daath3 (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]