Jump to content

Talk:Indian Marriage (card game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconGames Start‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Refs[edit]

I can't find any reference for this game. Is it a variation of Indian Rummy? PDCook (talk) 04:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reply -

This is the most famous and common variation of rummy also called Gandhari , because the joker is hidden. The reference to this game is not available on web because most of the people who play this game dose not use internet too often , also this game evolved as hit and try method in a period of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashbuddy (talkcontribs) 13:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page name[edit]

Other pages of this type that have ambiguous proper names generally append "(card game)". So I propose the name be changed to Indian Marriage (card game). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zatsugaku (talkcontribs) 19:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 19:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Indian MarriageIndian Marriage (card game) – Other pages of this type that have very ambiguous names generally append "(card game)" as with Marriage (card game), James Bond (card game), Spit (card game), Rolling Stone (card game), etc. While certainly not a universal applied convention, it improves clarity and reduces confusion during search. And yes, I’m sensitive to the issue of field packing in the name space. Zatsugaku (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.