Talk:Indian Peace Commission/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this in a day or two. auntieruth (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GreenMeansGo, I've read through this. Very interesting. So sorry for the delay. See my edits here. auntieruth (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries auntieruth. I did see the tweaks you've been doing. Are there any specific additional areas of weakness you feel need addressed? GMG ^talk 14:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

would you go through it again and clean up, similar to what i've done? Sometimes it seems repetitive, and sometimes I'm not sure what treaty we're talking about....auntieruth (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey auntieruth. I've gone through again and tried to clear up where I can. I'm not sure how much more I can really simplify things given the breadth of the topic covering 5ish other main articles. GMG ^talk 15:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed