Talk:Indispensable party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 22:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Indispensable partyRequired party

  • Indispensable party is a term that became obsolete in 2007. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure now calls it a "Required Party" (see the current version of FRCP Rule 19); the Civil Procedure in the United States template on the right side of the Civil Procedure articles should also be updated with the current terminology Relisted. BDD (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 24.61.131.114 (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • object to speedy rename; show that most jurisdictions have renamed it, not just federal courts. The article says that several different jurisdictions use the term. -- 65.94.77.181 (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.