Talk:Inductive logic programming

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Possible conflict of interest[edit]

The reference to ILP being first introduced in Stephen Muggleton paper was added by user User:Smuggleton, which I assume is the same Stephen Muggleton. Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines suggest a person shouldn't mention themselves in this way. I don't doubt the truth of the statement, but there's no specific citation (the book referenced does cite the 1991 aricle, and mentions Muggleton's contribution, but does not explicitly say that's the first use of the term). The sentence should probably be removed as a result. (Oh, forgot signature: ) -Agyle 09:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can try a few google searches (e.g. "inductive logic programming * muggleton" or ""inductive logic programming * first * muggleton". Amongst the others, this is probably a good paper to cite MordenBus (talk) 23:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should consider the truth an absolute defense in self-mentions, as it is in defamation suits. There's no better authority on authors than themselves. Gherson2 (talk) 19:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References?[edit]

Direct hyperlinks to conference proceedings and papers would be most useful! sydhart (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conference and Technique[edit]

If ILP is a general technique, and also the name of a conference about that technique, it seems like they should have separate pages. After all, the object oriented programming page does not have the list of OOPSLA locations listed. 128.193.39.36 (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Example section[edit]

I moved the Example section on computing rlgg's to the Golem (ILP) article, where I think it makes most sense as long as their is no dedicated article on lgg's and related topics. Felix QW (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]