Jump to content

Talk:Information Awareness Office/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1


News

--209.175.150.150 (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I just came across the new national journal article describing how this program was continued under a different name, at least until the end of 2004. http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0223nj1.htm

As I haven't done any work editing this page, I'll post here first, and not just add the update myself, as you guys obviously have your thoughts on how it should be done.

Misc.

Lets get rid of the list of media critical of "total info.". Definitely change the name to avoid confusion with actual program addressed in article. Since none of the works question the program itself but rather the Orwellian vision of critics of this program - I think there is inherent POV. Lotsofissues 12:32, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Is the list of books and movies at the end exploring Total Information Awareness appropriate for this article? --kwertii

I believe so, several other articles have ".. in pop-culture" sections, I find this suitable.--72.38.204.116 15:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

yes. those books are warnings to all about the evils of the IAO Vera Cruz 05:46 Dec 17, 2002 (UTC)

I doubt that they are appropriate. They're all against what TIA is obviously for, so you could argue that listing them is not NPOV. (and no, I don't like TIA either). --KQ
I tried to come up with some counterexamples that would paint TIA in a favorable light, but I couldn't think of any... kwertii
Too bad Poindexter disconnected his phone, maybe he could help us out.  ;-) --KQ

Lets roadtrip and visit him! Vera Cruz 06:58 Dec 17, 2002 (UTC)

We could invite him to join Wikipedia and provide NPOV balance on this article. ;) --Brion

not listing them would be POV--while the books are POV the fact that they were written and are undeniably related to IAO issues is quite NPOV Vera Cruz 05:48 Dec 17, 2002 (UTC)

Hm. interesting point. --KQ

i added in the research sections here, most of the information was on the iao's own website. anybody have anything to add to that? i must say the more i learn the more scared i am. the time is fast approaching when we all must leave the country to escape dictatorship before it is too late. "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation, we must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." -- Adolf Hitler User:MarcusAurelius 0619 CST

Why don't you go live in Amsterdam for a year and try telling us then how awful the us government is! Vera Cruz 13:08 Dec 18, 2002 (UTC)

But Amsterdam's really nice. Lovely old churches, classical music, canals, flowers, friendly people...

What was your point, exactly? Are you perhaps saying that U.S. citizens shouldn't criticise their government on their own soil? I thought that freedom was the whole point of the U.S. constitution. The Anome

Freedom of speech? What freedom of speech?

Vera Cruz

The logo change

OMFG, the IAO blazon is horrifying. Kingturtle 01:58 21 May 2003 (UTC)

Scary, isn't it? Big Brother, anybody? -- Zoe
My first thought on seeing it is that the IAO would have to be incredibly stupid to use this design. Are we sure it is not a hoax? Why would an agency deliberately use symbols which would inevitably evoke memories of 1984/freemasonic conspiracies/world domination? You'd think they would pretend to be warm, fuzzy, and protective.... -- Someone else 02:56 21 May 2003 (UTC)
True, I can't find the image at http://www.darpa.mil/iao/ Kingturtle 02:59 21 May 2003 (UTC)
it's true; they pulled it after public backlash. I did see it there just after the program was announced. Koyaanis Qatsi P.S. another P.R. stunt: the Total Information Awareness program is now the "Terrorist Information Awareness" program. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=581&ncid=581&e=4&u=/nm/20030520/tc_nm/attack_privacy_dc
The original Total Information Awareness logo can also be seen at the net archive, at http://web.archive.org/web/20021027211118/http://www.darpa.mil/iao/
This link no longer works. The memoryhole.org reference below goes to a web page that does not match the format of the main darpa.mil in late 2002 as documented at archive.org. Not taking a stand, just noting the peculiar. -wr

According to http://www.thememoryhole.org/policestate/iao-logo.htm, they deleted the logo. See http://www.thememoryhole.org/policestate/iao/iao-original.htm for what their website supposedly originally looked like. -- Zoe

I just wondered if anyone had seen it actually on their website (is memoryhole.org a reliable source? I have/had no idea.) But if KQ saw it on the actual site, I guess it's just a case of REALLY bad public relations rather than hoax! -- Someone else 03:06 21 May 2003 (UTC)

I saw the site when it first came up, that was the logo! Pizza Puzzle

The ACLU has a page on this peculiar logo change as well: The much-discussed original and the new, less frightening "sanitized" version. I also saw the original logo myself at the official site at the time. --Vinsci 16:10, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Well, the Illuminati only have a limited degree of influence here in Wikipedia... The whole concept of a free, self-sustaining, god-forbid DEMOCRATIC online encyclopaedia goes directly against the agenda of most groups that could be described as 'Illuminati' (such as the Vrill society)...

J.A.M.M

I think they want us to fear them it saves them time from having to think there is a agent in every bar,brothel,stadium,and fast food place in the world. -Ranger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.214.86 (talk) 17:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

NPOV Disputes

I put an NPOV dispute warning on this (it's accurate, I'm disputing the neutrality right here) because of the second paragraph and also the end of the first: is it really necessary to bring up Iran-Contra? --Charles A. L. 17:23, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC)

I think so. It's Poindexter's main claim to fame - most people, if they've heard of him at all, will know him in connection with Iran-Contra. It's not really disputed that he was involved, so how's that POV? The public controversy surrounding his appointment centered on his role in Iran-Contra, so that must also be mentioned.. Kwertii 19:36, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
It's what we said, not how we said it. Well, actually, you're not wrong, so I guess in part it is how we said it:
former National Security Advisor to President Ronald Reagan and chief architect of the Iran-Contra Affair.
This makes these each seem like roles he's had in the same way -- "first he was hired in National Security, then they transferred him to Illegal Covert Operations." Except in my most cynical moments I'm inclined to believe it was the national security part of his résumé that recommended him for this job, not his criminal activities. I don't think removing (or at least moving) the Iran-contra reference would detract from the article. You clearly disagree, so I'm not changing it. However, if it is needless, its very presence could be taken as POV.
Perhaps a more blatantly neutral phrasing, something like "controversy over Poindexter's integrity followed his appointment to the [IAO] position due to his role in the Iran-Contra scandal," which is what's in John Poindexter, would blunt that impression somewhat. --Charles A. L. 20:01, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC)

Since no one else got off their butts and did it, I edited the article to rephrase the items identified as NPOV, and removed the NPOV warning.

Also, please see Talk:LifeLog.

I have made several (relatively minor, IMO) changes to the Introduction section, with the aim of removing some excessive adjectives that give the overall impression of a non-NPOV. I attempted as much as possible to retain all factual content in the paragraph I edited. I think there are some other places in the article that could use this treatment as well, but I only went after what I thought was the most glaring NPOV. -- Kadin2048 22:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

"implented" typo

Under Genisys, "implented" = "implemented". Great article, by the way.

Seems like the IAO homepage has vanished from darpa.mil. Anybody know where it went? Google won't help, neither will the darpa search.

Joke?

Is this article a joke? Does this really exist? It sounds like something out of a bad novel, not reality. -Branddobbe 02:33, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)

No, it's not a joke. Please see mass surveillance as well as the articles that link to it. And that's not the full story. --Vinsci 16:10, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Poindextor's felony record

Poindexter might be an evil person and certainly was convicted of multiple felony counts, but those convictions were overturned. I've added a comment clarifying this after the remarks about his convictions. Joshua 22:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

NY Times Article

The following NYTimes article from 2005.12.24 seems to suggest that a program very similar to Total Information Awareness still secretly exists: 'Spy Agency Mined Vast Data Trove, Officials Report' Should this be a footnote on the article page, somewhere? We can't definitively say that TIA still exists, but it should be noted that a similar program still seems to be out there. (unsigned comment by User:68.101.106.185)

That actually isn't the same as TIA at all. - Erick12 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Information Processing Technology Office?

The Wikipedia entry for "Information Processing Technology Office" seems to describe the mission of IPTO to be almost identical to the mission of the supposedly-retired IAO... Not sure how to link the 2, just thought I'd point that out to you who are more experienced with Wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Processing_Technology_Office especially http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LifeLog "LifeLog aims to compile a massive electronic database of every activity and relationship a person engages in. This is to include credit card purchases, web sites visited, the content of telephone calls and e-mails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, instant messages sent and received, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, biomedical data captured through wearable sensors, The high level goal of this data logging is to identify "preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality." ( http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/Solicitations/PIP_03-30.html )

Futures

"It will analyze data from the world's economy in an attempt to predict political instability, threats to national security, and in general every major event in the near future."

I don't know about this program in particular, but the quote which precedes this analysis seems to say that they want to study something like a futures exchange, except on civil events instead of traditional economic activities. Really not unlike the websites that took bets on the papal enclave, if you remember that. (Opinion polls tell you what people WANT to happen, but markets tell you what people are willing to put money on.) So unless this program is doing that AND the above, I think this article is misinterpreting it.

I'm not editing it because I don't know enough about the subject, but may I suggest somebody clarify it? IEdML 23:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

IAO Research

Many of the subjects in this section are overcomplicated. Should it be re-written in simpler terms? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.91.22 (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/21/AR2007122102544.html

does it fit to the ext. links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.217.136 (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

There is no mention of IAO being a US institution in the briefing. It just says "national security". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.195.37.137 (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

this is very good

i find it funny that this is happening, as the we have periodically predicted a very inevidible outcome of genysis via movies and books and media. Matrix? IRobot? Resident Evil? a super computer that gathers information on every individual to an almost perfection, allowing it to basically shape the whole of humanity through its predetermined actions.

imagine coming across someone that sees directly through your core. he knows everything about you and the decision and behaviors you partake in. nothing you can hide from him. imagine the intimidation and the fear. you couldnt hide from this person because he can predict your every move. he has the ability to basically control you. now elaborate this to every single human being.

thats what this supercomputer is.

imagine the person that controls it.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goflow (talk • contribs) 18:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I totally agree with you, but please see WP:NOTAFORUM. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
It's difficult to find a core in Existential nihilism and Absurdism=P.Smallman12q (talk) 00:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Needs Cleanup

The link to the "Office" ("External links") gives the impression of leading to the official page, but does in fact link to a well known conspiracy site, Infowars ("http://infowar.net/tia/www.darpa.mil/iao/"). Actually several of the links go to Infowars, but giving the impression they lead to the governement pages (See Genoa/Genoa II etc). The link that claims Darpa deleted the logo is dead. If pages are deleted from the original site and still needs to be linked, I suggest using a neutral site such as Wayback-machine, rather than a heavily biased site such as Infowars. Whichever, it should be clearly marked on each link the links goes to archived material on external sites, not the original source. The term "official website -- mirror" gives the impression it is an offical mirror, which they are not, and should therefore not be used. SLOB1 (talk) 11:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Needs a legitimate source

This quote worries me a bit: "This would be achieved by creating enormous computer databases to gather and store the personal information of everyone in the United States, including personal e-mails, social networks, credit card records, phone calls, medical records, and numerous other sources, without any requirement for a search warrant."

I have spent the last twenty minutes or so searching for the origin of this sentence and have yet to find a reliable source on it. What I did see was a whole lot of conspiracy websites that used the quote is discussion about the New World Order and other gibberish. If that was an official mission statement released by the group itself (like many websites have claimed) it should not be so terribly difficult to find a source for it. If it wasn't an official statement by the group it has no business being in this article.

I'm removing it until someone can provide something better than a newspaper article to support it.

Primecut (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Is a Review and Update of this Needed? -- June 2013

In view of (1) the explosion of personal information voluntarily posted on social-media websites; (2) the availability of massive data-farms and software tools for searching and processing massive-data; (3) Internet User Tracking by hundreds of Corporate Marketing Analysis groups for "targeted ads," etc.; and (4) the (June 2013) NSA revelations regarding governmental access to Phone and Internet data -- we have possibly exceeded the 2001 objectives of "Total Information Awareness." Even distributed, how does the current situation relate to the 2001 concept and objectives?

If so, does this "Total Information Awareness" Wikipedia topic need review and updating relative to the current state of uber-personal-data and their use and misuse by governments and other privileged institutions? And are there new NPOV issues exposed by the various new information leaks? HalFonts (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

"TIA archives available" - not true

currently says: //Copies of the original IAO web pages formerly available at http://www.darpa.mil/iao/ (June 12, 2002–June 3, 2003) can be found at Archive.org, Internet Archive//. i put this here because all of the archive/s crawler links say "not found" within them. that would seem to imply it was crawled back then, but returned "not found", but why would someone post that as a link/reference on the wiki page? so was it edited in some way? was there ever really archived copies there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom.jennings (talk • contribs) 06:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Somebody must have just put a link to the wrong date on Archive.org here. There is an archived copy of the IAO site here: https://web.archive.org/web/20020805112136/http://www.darpa.mil/IAO/ Mesoderm (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Information Awareness Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Information Awareness Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Information_Awareness_Office/Archive_1&oldid=807949300"