Jump to content

Talk:Infrastructure of the Brill Tramway/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DavidCane (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    made some copy edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    very widely sourced
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    not much more could be said. Main articles and station articles, cover all other aspects.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Yep
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Once again a superior product from the House of Iridescent.--DavidCane (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]