Talk:Inlet manifold
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
![]() | Material from Manifold (automotive) was split to Inlet manifold on 15:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Manifold (automotive). |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Automotive engineering
[edit]I know next to nothing about engines but don't aeroplanes with internal combustion engines also have intake manifolds? So it isn't just automotive engineering is it? I'd presume that other internal combustion engines for other uses would also have intake manifolds as well, like trains and smaller ship etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriosissimus (talk • contribs) 20:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Are you aware that "internal combustion engine" also includes jet engines and rocket engines? Stepho talk 20:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Is this is relation to the first sentence of the lead? "In automotive engineering, an inlet manifold is..." In that case, I'd agree. For some other things, like categorization into Auto parts, that's part of it, but it doesn't imply that it's an exclusive scope.
- I can't think of better wording available offhand, but if anyone sees a better link, we could switch to it. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)