Talk:Innovation Unit
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2023. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
"The" Innovation Unit
[edit]That age old problem of "The" with organisation's names is a problem here. This organisation is definitely "The Innovation Unit Limited" as listed at Companies House. However their branding and website gives just plain "Innovation Unit". Of course, in their articles they invariable write "the Innovation is doing such and such ...". The problem is the article is called "The Innovation Unit". I suppose a page move might be in order (to "Innovation Unit"), but I don't know. Seaweed (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Correct on all counts; I have moved the page to reflect this. Marthiemoo (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Innovation Unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110506023841/http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true to http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED465856&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED465856
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Over and over "it" lacks proper antecedent in this article.
[edit]The pronoun "it" should only be used when it refers to the closest preceding possible noun. But too often in this article, it obviously refers to a more remote noun. In such cases, the noun should be used. (PeacePeace (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC))