Talk:Insulacebus

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Insulacebus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

Request to move page to "Haitian monkey" Makes more sense 98.15.10.143 (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 August 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move . (non-admin closure) — YoungForever^(talk) 19:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insulacebus → Haitian monkey – Makes more sense to change the name and make it more accessible. Having the genus name be the title of the page doesn't work well with categories 98.15.10.143 (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; fossil genera are generally referred to by their Latin name. Also, "Haitian monkey" gives the impression there are monkeys surviving in Haiti, which, simians aside, is not the case. Tisquesusa (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; It's not a good idea to name a monkey after a geographic area when the full diversity of the area's former primate fauna may not be known. WolfmanSF (talk) 23:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do any sources even call it this? What when another Haitian monkey taxon is found? FunkMonk (talk) 12:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Does not meet the naming conventions for taxa. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Taxobox info[edit]

Fossilworks places this species in tribe Aotini in superfamily Ateloidea, they also say the genus is sister to Aotus and Xenothrix. This is problematic for several reasons: Aotini is no longer used, as it is now the family Aotidae; the current family makeup of Platyrrhini places all five families together with no superfamily groupings; Aotus and Xenothrix are in different families (Xenothrix is in Pitheciidae). I'm going to change the taxobox to point to Aotidae instead of Aotini. I'm also going to make a note at talk:Aotidae that I'll be updating the article to include this extinct species. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's helpful to remember that Fossilworks is a garbage scow, not a buffet, of paleontological information. It has lots of useful information, but, its usefulness is limited by needing to sift the wheat from the mountains of chafe, outdated information and other garbage.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take that as support and encouragement. :) - UtherSRG (talk) 10:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like GBIF and IRMNG also agree with placing this genus in Aotidae. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, also, Fossilworks is sometimes helpful in helping locate the original describing papers for a taxon. I think that that also, unfortunately, helps contribute to the contributors' habit of not updating the taxonomy the site presents, too.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. This article was relatively easy, but it lead me to List_of_fossil_primates_of_South_America... See the talk there.... - UtherSRG (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However, Insulacebus is not in Aotidae. And it turns out Aotidae isn't closely related to Pitheciidae. At least, according to what I found and sumarrized at talk:List_of_fossil_primates_of_South_America. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil NWM reorganization[edit]

Please see the discussion at Talk:List_of_fossil_primates_of_South_America#Taxonomy. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]