Talk:Internal control/Archives/2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Added content
Added the content that goes beyond the IIA-definition of control and removed the deletion warning - this article should stay! This is a start, feel free to add more.
F2s. Is the IIA's definitions still valid? It was included in the glossary of old standards that have been replaced 2002. The other question: is ANYTHING that increases likelihood that established objectives and goals will be achieved control: training, getting more resources, sleeping well...
Anyway, internal control is not an ACTIVITY like internal audit. In stead, internal control can be ragarded as a system, a process, arrangements, control, etc.
Why does internal control systems fail?
Internal Control systems fail because 1. it was not designed and implemented well at the beginnning 2. change in environment in which it operates making them outdated or ineffective to address risks. 3. change in operations that renders it ineffective to address or mitigate risks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.216.189 (talk) 11:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Please add citation for this section or it will be removed.Farcaster (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
COSO link
The link goes to a disambiguation page. Could s.o. check and link it to the proper choice there. THKS. 99.11.160.111 (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
See Also: CAQ
Is this some kind of self promotion? As of 2010/Sep/21 the page read "this is very important tools which is very useful for system management and help the take right discion for right time."118.71.168.109 (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)