Talk:International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

Icsrteam (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Hello. I would like to express that this article is not intended for any advertisement purposes. Just to mention the existence of this particular centre for encyclopaedic purposes. I would appreciate it if you could give me advice on how I should write the article to avoid bias and any other neutrality issues. thanks[reply]

Hello! First of all, you should attempt to prove the notability of the subject. As the centre been the subject of any books? Of any newspaper articles? Something like that should be referred to. However, it is best not to at all create articles about things you are involved in yourself. If the article gets deleted now, you should wait until someone else recreates it and then, with caution, proceed to edit it. Note to admin: if this is deleted, please move this to the talk page of User:Icsrteam. It would be a shame if I wrote it without s/he never reading it. Plrk (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I'm trying to sort this thing out but im not computer wiz so it may take time. Is there a deadline for me to sort it out? thnx. 137.73.98.157 (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Even if there are not many refs for the centre, the quality of the members is certainly notable. I think it should be given a chance and we can WP:AFD if it does not improve. --Triwbe (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

137.73.98.157 (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Wonderful. I can find newspaper articles that mentions the name of the centre several times by Home Sec Jaqui Smith etc. I should be able to find it by tomorrow. And as you say, the members of the centre is definitely notable, given that two of the people in the members have a wikipedia article written about them![reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

[edit]

This article is clearly written by someone who works for or is tied to the organization and it is written like an advertisement. This is particularly poor as this organization is controversial. Please delete this immediately. Nhgrrl (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial? I don't see controversy. But yes, the article and the Institute are still rather vague. --Corriebertus (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]