Talk:International Conference on Surface Plasmon Photonics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 April 2019 by reviewer Gpkp (talk · contribs).

Physics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

undone changes from 17:28, 3 June 2019‎ Randykitty[edit]

Can someone explain this?

I am for undoing the deletion of my changes, on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Conference_on_Surface_Plasmon_Photonics

the following reasons were given:

"unencyclopedic: WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTWEBHOST, belongs on organization's own website"
(NB: "encyclopedic (also encyclopaedic) ADJECTIVE 1 Comprehensive in terms of information". Source: Oxford Dict.)
there is no SPP conference website. it is organized by individual hosts. - hence wikipedia. given an overview of historic information.
WP:NOTDIRECTORY doesnt apply.
WP:NOTWEBHOST doesnt apply. [otherwise please explain.]

My changes, providing history to the locations, chairs (scientists) is a key encyclopedic information.

See e.g. thousandfold of wikipedia articles like

a conference's history must included past events and key people and dates. - lists and maps of the history of events are all over wikipedia. thousandfold. to delete all these entries in hundreds of articles would be 'unencyclopedic'. :-(

can someone comment on this? otherwise i will undone the changes. it is slowing down the progress of the article with regard to many more developed articles of similar subject matter.

marcus 130.226.87.11 (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing those articles to my attention, when I find a moment, I will clean those up. As for the fact that you can find articles that don't conform to our guidelines, well, the simple fact is that with almost 6 million articles, that is basically unavoidable. We call that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (or, less reverently, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). --Randykitty (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

............ ? You can't be serious, can you? You are in the wrong here. Not the millions of articles. And you do not address the raised questions. The reasons you gave do not apply. A history normally includes the past. A Wikipedia is nothing without historic overviews of events etc. - Could you please comment on it? - e.g. why should the main article for a sports event not include its history? an encyclopedia is the ONLY place where that can be found. 130.226.87.11 (talk) 12:33, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing special about a scientific meeting in some year taking place in, e.g. Rome or Barcelona or wherever. The content of the meeting will not change according to location. So unless something special happened, it is absolutely uninteresting to say that a conference took place in Berlin in 1981. See Behavior Genetics Association, for example. Despite having had annual meetings since the early 70s, only one meeting is mentioned because something of note happened and is documented by independent reliable sources. Similarly, unless there are such sources documenting a person's involvement with the meeting, information about who was the local host is absolutely uninteresting to any reader. --Randykitty (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]