Talk:International Council of Nurses

Nursing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance on Organized Labour Project scale

The ICN is an international association of nursing groups. It is not an association of nurses unions. While many of the ICN's members may be nurses unions, not all of them are. For example, in the United States, ICN is represented by the American Nurses Association (ANA) -- which is not a labor union. (The ANA's labor arm, the United American Nurses, is autonomous and not subject to the control or policies of the management-dominated ANA.) Many nurses unions are unable to gain entry to the ICN because an existing organization already holds ICN membership. This is a particularly sore point in Western Europe and the U.S. - Tim1965 18:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NURSE priority review

As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to mid per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Cheers, Basie (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]