Talk:International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Overstating?[edit]

"one of the largest international scientific projects ever conducted". C'mon. There are even more comprehensive publications in this specific area. Handbook of Statistics by Elsevier has some 20+ volumes. Tijfo098 (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tijfo098, please try not to extract a part of the sentence when you want to prove something. With that strategy you can prove or disprove any premise or your initial hypothesis. It is clearly written that it is one of the largest international scientific projects ever conducted from the the number of involved countries, which is 105. In other words, it is not a comparison from the number of pages, or volumes. Speaking of your suggested title Handbook of Statistics, it is a great work, but the sheer number of participated countries is much smaller than 105. Best regards!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientist789 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]