Talk:International Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Both"?[edit]

The '65 and '85 groups are the two referred to by the two usages of the word "both" in the early part of this article. Are those statements also true of the '62 group, in which case, "both" should become "all three" or simply "they"? BobFromBrockley 10:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IG that split from the RSL in '61 was the same group who re-entered it in '64 and left finally in '65 so there are only two groups. I'll re write it to make that clear.Haldraper (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's much better. Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the proposed deletion[edit]

I oppose the proposal to delete. While the two groups are notable only in their relationship to the RSL and IMG, in the 1960s, and to the IMG and Socialist Outlook in the 1980s, it would be laborious to duplicate this content into those four pages, and we would lose the level of detail here. Duncan (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]