Talk:Interstate 59 in Mississippi

	U.S. roads portal This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	Mississippi

United States: Mississippi

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Mississippi portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mississippi.

Untitled[edit]

Any comments or questions regarding I-59 in La. or Miss. are now welcomed. --Bdj95 05:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, talk pages on Wikipedia are intended to discuss the article – ways to improve the article, clarifications when the text is unclear, that sort of thing. It's not for general questions about the subject. -- NORTH ^talk 18:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scope: should Louisiana and Mississippi be combined?[edit]

About six months ago, this article was created, combining the two states because there is very little in Louisiana. NE2 recently made the companion Interstate 59 in Alabama and Georgia; I-59 is similarly short in Georgia. Scott5114 then decided that this was a bad idea, and moved them to cover Mississippi and Alabama only, arguing that the other states can be covered in Interstate 59. NE2 disagrees, saying that it makes sense to be consistent and cover all four states in subpages.

I think I agree with Scott. His idea is the most consistent and practical. If a particular state's stretch of interstate highway is long enough and / or important enough to warrant its own article then of course it should get one. Sometimes just one city's stretch of interstate is important enough to justify its own article (like Atanta's Downtown Connector, for instance). But if a state (or a city) interstate's features can be summed up, substantially, in one or two paragraphs then I should think it could be covered in the parent article (in this case Interstate 59). Berberry (talk) 19:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]