Jump to content

Talk:Into Eternity (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Melodic Death Metal

[edit]

So now there Melodic Death Metal too? I thought they were just Prog Death Metal...

Melodic death metal fits their genre. I'd say they are Prog (melodic) Death metal --Dexter prog 23:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. In my experience, melodeath is generally slower and more atmospheric than into eternity is. Bands like Amon Amarth, Dark Tranquility, ect. don't sound anything like Into Eternity. While Into Eternity is certainly melodic, they aren't "melodic death" as far as belonging to that genre. Here is where i notice into eternity's big influences lie. Power Metal-Progressive Metal-Death Metal-NWOAHM/Metalcore What I propose really, since Into Eternity are hard to class, is that we basically just label them as either an "extreme metal" band, and be sure to mention in the article how difficult it is to class them, or, if we are truly anal retentive, we can label them as progressive death/power. Either way works for me.

I guess it has elements of melodeath... but no way are Into Eternity a melodic death metal group. Progressive metal maybe? They're pretty hard to pidgeonhole. - Kensane (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IntoEternityTSOA.jpg

[edit]

Image:IntoEternityTSOA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IntoEternityBIO.jpg

[edit]

Image:IntoEternityBIO.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cover tsoa200.jpg

[edit]

Image:Cover tsoa200.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:846121491 l.jpg

[edit]

Image:846121491 l.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cover bio200.jpg

[edit]

Image:Cover bio200.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

I have rated this as a Start Class, as it is organized and detailed enough to be above a Stub Class article. I have rated it of low importance, as people are unlikely to be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 23:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HA! Just you wait. The band is getting more and more popular. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 00:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean/Death Vocals????

[edit]

I think it is compromising to the artist's integrity to refer to a stylistic difference between vocals as clean vocals and death vocals. Vocals are vocals; making this distinction is one of the reasons why Metal gets a bad rap. Please try to think of music as art and not as some movement designed around promoting some image or fad. Progressive rock music and metal should be held to the same standards as any kind of music. It has nothing to do with being or sounding a particlar way. It is not an "industry of cool." It is art, plain and simple. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.205.172 (talk) 23:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While it surely is an art, there are metal bands and rock bands that clearly sound different from each other. If you have a problem with this then I don't know what to say. And clean vocals are referring to bands that use it as opposed to growls and shrieks, etc in their otherwise aggressive approach, while death vocals are growled and these are death growls and vary from style to style most often. So again why fret for these reasons you say. It doesn't make sense and it's just exclusionism. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 23:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Exclusionism? I'm having a rough time understanding how my opinion is exclusive. I think that trying to separate what is "metal" and what is "rock" is exclusionist. Genres don't really exist, they are merely used to describe what an artist creates. I'm promoting an appreciation for music that eliminates distinctions that constrict and limit artistic expression.

Metal music is not just about screaming, growling, feeling tough, and banging your head. Metal bands shouldn't think about the differences between "clean" and "death" vocals. It really limits your possibilities. They should just sing and leave it at that. Whatever comes out is their artistic creation. One of my favorite bands is Between the Buried and Me. I would say his vocal range is vast, and he sings very well. But I think it gets really generic sounding when bands try to split time between "singing clean" and "growling." It is a really simplistic way of looking at art and music.

It also undermines the abilities of talented and creative bands to refer to their vocal styles as growling or "death vocals." I don't really care much for bands that have a very generic growl as the basis of their vocals. I don't think that's very creative. I do listen to hundreds of metal bands on a regular basis, and my favorite ones have such good vocals that it would be a disgrace to call their vocals "death vocals." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.205.172 (talk) 22:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you say. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 23:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Stenberger

[edit]

I know he was only a touring member between Chris Krall and Stu Block, but would it be worth mentioning him in the former members section? They were originally intending to keep him for the next record, but I guess they had a fallout- I can give a link if you'd like. 68.198.252.107 (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Into Eternity (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Into_Eternity_(band)&oldid=1207180120"