Talk:Invasion of Guadeloupe (1810)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • I found two missing commas (for shame!) but have added them already.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another fine article, Jacky. Other than the most minor of issues (already changed), the article passes on first reading. Good job! — Bellhalla (talk) 12:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much!--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)