Talk:Inventory of Henry VIII

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mil Hist Evaluation Commentary[edit]

I evaluated the article against the B-list criteria of the WP: Military History. Here are my comments:

  • Coverage and Accuracy: The article admits that it is not a comprehensive list, and without being more familiar with the Inventory, I didn't feel comfortable rating yes or no.
  • Grammar and Style: There are several relatively minor errors in spelling, conjugation, etc, probably mostly typos. However, in the Manuscripts section, the manuscripts in collections are referred to in a manner that assumes some a priori knowledge on the part of the reader.
  • Supporting materials: Not sure if an infobox is helpful here, but check other similar articles for precedent. A few photos would help, for example, of one of the castles, or example photos of one of the items listed.

Good luck. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has come a long way. Re-assessed as B-class for WP:Military History.Boneyard90 (talk) 06:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inventory of Henry VIII of England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]