Talk:Inverness and Ross-shire Railway

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inverness and Ross-shire Railway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Merge into History of the Far North Line?

The railway from Inverness to Wick and Thurso is viewed nowadays as a single entity, but it was built by four different companies.

This article badly needs extending and providing some proper citations, but the History of the Far North Line is already well written and, with a little enhancement, could be a much better record of the I&RR, and its relationship with the later constructions. NB there is a Far North Line article as well, but I am referring here to the History article.

I propose therefore that this present article should be merged into the "History" article. This article doesn't contain any information that can't be retrieved from source material quite easily. --Afterbrunel (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not much support for that, so I'll leave it.--Afterbrunel (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]