Talk:Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Assessment notice[edit]
Assessment notice: Importance should be high for this film. Hoverfish 17:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why? It's barely known nowadays. There are for more important films. Cop 633 18:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, in Europe and in its time, it was something like The Strawberry Statement (film) was in the U.S.A.: a strong critism on the establishment and its misuse of power. But I can't argue about what you say. It's surely faded in the past. Events have bypassed it. The one thing that I find missing is any serious clues in the importance assessment scale. The link in the template points to a scale of article quality rather than film importance. So I let always this "unknown". Hoverfish 22:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Currently there is not an Importance parameter in {{WikiProject Film}}. There is a Core parameter, but it isn't added to articles on a per-user basis, and the list is updated on a yearly basis. For more information please see: Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Core, or feel free to discuss this with the coordinators, or post a comment on the core list's talk page. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Critical Reception[edit]
Created new section (Critical Reception) and added New York Times quote. Xela Zeugirdor (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)