A fact from Iranian frozen assets appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that $100–$120 billion worth of Iranian assets are frozen around the world and the nuclear agreement will lead to the release of only about $30 billion of it?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Iran's frozen assets → Frozen Assets of Iran – Normally, pages seem to be named similarly, but I don't know if this is just nitpicking, since I couldn't find any policies on the subject. Goose121 (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting.Anarchyte(work | talk) 11:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Should this page be moved to "Frozen assets of Iran"? Normally, pages seem to be named similarly, but I don't know if this is just nitpicking, since I couldn't find any policies on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goose121 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm the creator of his page. While I'm not against the suggested title, I think the current one has the benefit of having "Iran" at the beginning which increases the chance of being found when the users are typing Iran! Mhhossein (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Undoubtedly my proposal serves to fix that problem. The usage of the possessive in article titles is near non-existent. The adjectival form is much more natural. RGloucester — ☎ 14:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: in any case, "asset" is not a proper noun, and so should not be capitalized (unless of course the consensus is to have that word first in the article title).
@Mhhossein: some sources obviously use title case, but as you may have seen, there were also other examples, such as "What is an asset?". And in wikipedia, we only capitalize proper nouns per both MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS. HandsomeFella (talk) 06:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
.svg){kind=small}
