Talk:Iraq Freedom Congress

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Iraq

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is there a citation for the alleged anti-Leninism of the WCPIraq? Brashley46 15:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the adjective, it seemed irrelevant. --Brian Z (talk) 01:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you can use Yahoo group postings as a credible source. They sould be reference to the original source of the information. --Dudeman5685 (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marked the article for neutrality concerns. Most of the sources and claims in the article come from the organization itself, which is neither reliable nor verifiable when their website offers no evidence or sources of its own. There is also a rather serious insinuation that the US military was involved in an assassination, despite no reputable source to back it up. The White Tiger Leb (talk) 08:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

It seems that the references here are all either a) dead links, b) sources of questionable independence / reliability or c) passing mentions of the existence of the organization with little substance. Unless I have overlooked a few key sources buried in the list, that would mean this article should be deleted. If the allegations of human rights violations in the article are true (which I have no reason to doubt), it is completely outrageous that they have not been documented, but nonetheless, I do think the Wikipedia guidelines for notability should be applied. --Brian Z (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Iraq Freedom Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070202042445/http://www.ifcongress.com:80/English/ to http://www.ifcongress.com/English/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]