Talk:Irreducible element
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Irreducible element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100620170712/http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/IrreducibleIdeal.html to http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/IrreducibleIdeal.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Zero divisors[edit]
Hello @D.Lazard: I am confused about your edit here: [1]. Irreducibility is defined also for (commutative) rings which are not integral domains, see for example [2] or [3], see also some research in this direction here [4]. Maximilian Janisch (talk) 10:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- To editor Maximilian Janisch: You are right that the definition can be (and has been) extended to any ring, including non-commutative ones. This nust be mentioned in the lead. However these extensions of the concept are not notable enough for WP. So, I have restored the previous definition (restricted to integral domains), added context explaining the importance of the context, and mentioned the possible extensions of the definitions. D.Lazard (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- @D.Lazard: Thank you for the information, the second paragraph that you added is quite interesting! I have added a bit more context on the difference between integral domains and commutative rings, cf. my latest edit. Meilleures salutations -- Maximilian Janisch (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)