Jump to content

Talk:Isabel Maxwell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion

[edit]

After I prodded the article, it has been improved greatly, and I was properly trouted. Bearian (talk) 00:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone change reference 9 (link now dead) to archived version?: https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100510/http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/03/10/34803.htm Tmciver (talk) 20:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isabel Maxwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emphasis on Ghislaine

[edit]

2001:ee0:4141:7cb2:d1bb:fe9c:b53c:5ad6 Hi there! I saw your edits and I felt they were undo. I don't object to including more direct referencing to Ghislaine, but including it in the lead and using an aside like 'Maxwell is sister to famed human trafficking suspect, Ghislaine Maxwell' feels pretty on the nose. Could you orient it more around Isabel's relationship to Ghislaine? Robert's article balances this in a reasonable way (if you're keen to include it). What do you think? Mad Jim Bey (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]