Jump to content

Talk:Islam in Tajikistan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How Many Muslims?

[edit]

There is alot of percentages being thrown around, but nothing that specifically states that X% are muslims? 146.235.130.52 (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I came here looking for that and didn't have any answer, more than ten years later. Aspacana (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced text

[edit]

Eliko007 recently (diff) restored some dubious text to the article. The text appears to have been added by an IP in February 2014 (diff) and is clearly unsuitable. To be retained, the text would need a source and some encyclopedic details, not to mention a major clean. What source justifies Category:Persecution by atheists? Johnuniq (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Islam in Tajikistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of repetitions

[edit]

This article is repeating itself a lot, mainly about laws and actions against Islam,, trying to manipulate people by making things even more worrying and dramatic than the things are.

Also, it is using rethotical fallacies trying to imply that veils were used in a secular way in history while this was in fact enforced by Islam, as an affirmation by itself and not as a quote from someone implicated by the situation.

This article should be rewritten in a more objective manner, not in the manner of an Islamic plead or even in the manner of a religious plead. Aspacana (talk) 01:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]