Talk:Islandia, Florida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

"The town is still incorporated, although the "residents" are very secretive, and the Miami Herald has speculated that no one actually resides there." Actually, as the entire island is part of the Biscayne National Monument, the only residents would be Park Rangers and other employees. --Emb021 20:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Ragged Keys are included in Biscayne National Park and also in the city of Islandia. (Zip 33035.) Ragged Key III is the only privately owned island in the Park and has a population of two people, (caretakers,) and two dogs.--67.142.130.48

My Grand Uncle Luther Brooks (1908-1988) was the first mayor and only resident of Islandia, Florida. He wanted to develop the city, but was not sucessful. He fell in love with Miami Hearld reporter Juanita Green while she was investigating his involvement in the project. - James Anthony Leone (1970 - )--64.171.164.42

The wording on this page is ridiculous! It's like it's been typed by a robot! Cazort (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This makes... no sense.[edit]

Habitable island in South Florida with six residents (or none, depending on whom you ask)? Why isn't it inhabited? Why is there no road to it? Do the supposed residents travel to obtain necessities by boat? Are there abandoned houses there? Can I move into one of them?? Is it within the borders of Biscayne National Park and thus undevelopable? I think this article needs answers to so many questions, and since I'm sure all sorts of journalists and researchers read Wikipedia, I beg of them to go out and find citable answers. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 19:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islandia, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]