Talk:Isotopes of neptunium

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Isotopes of neptunium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neptunium 219

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269317309942 half-life of 0.15ms (= -0.07 +0.72) This needs adding to the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.246.147 (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look (and has the gap from 220 to 224 inclusive been filled yet?). Double sharp (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now it has, save 221 only. :) Double sharp (talk) 09:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

²³⁴Np: Spin 0+?

That looks impossible as ²³⁴Np is an odd-odd nuclide. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

³⁴Cl also has 0+ spin. How is it impossible? Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I had always thought that the spin of an odd-odd nuclide can't be zero, as it is stated here: "If the numbers of protons and neutrons are both odd, the ground state nuclear spin is an integer larger than zero" ... 129.104.241.214 (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I found that ⁵⁰Mn, ⁶⁰Mn, ⁵⁴Co, ⁷⁴Co, ⁶²Ga, ⁶⁴Ga, ⁶⁶Ga, ⁶⁴As, ⁶⁶As, ⁷⁰Br, ⁷⁴Rb, ⁷⁴Rb, ⁷⁸Y, ⁸²Nb, ⁸⁶Tc, ⁹⁰Rh, ⁹⁴Ag, ⁹⁸In, ... also have spin 0+. This includes N = Z nuclides for odd Z = 17 and 25 through 49 (except 29). 129.104.241.214 (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictions regarding Np-237

The section Isotopes_of_neptunium#Shortage_of_237Np_stockpiles implies Np-237 decay doesn't involve gamma ray emission, but the section Isotopes_of_neptunium#Neptunium-237 includes a decay scheme showing gamma emissions at 29 KeV and 86 KeV. 2603:8080:E500:161F:24AA:52BD:4E5C:B896 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first link you mention is talking about Pu-238 decay, not Np-237 decay. Double sharp (talk) 07:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

²³⁷Np is an interesting nuclide

There are 8 alpha emitters having a short half-life between 10⁶ to 10⁸ years: ¹⁴⁶Sm (92.0 My), ¹⁵⁰Gd (1.79 My), ¹⁵⁴Dy (1.40 My), ^210mBi (3.04 My), ²³⁶U (23.42 My), ²³⁷Np (2.144 My), ²⁴⁴Pu (80 My), and ²⁴⁷Cm (15.7 My). I believe that among these nuclides only ²³⁶U and ²³⁷Np can be produced in large amounts :) 129.104.241.181 (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

¹⁵⁰Gd and ¹⁵⁴Dy are p-nuclei that can't be produced from neutron capture. ¹⁴⁴Sm might capture 2 neutrons to form ¹⁴⁶Sm, but I'm not sure do anyone did this before. ²⁴⁴Pu is hard to produce by slow neutron capture due to ²⁴³Pu bottleneck. ²⁴⁷Cm is also hard to produce because most atoms die from (n,SF) during its production, and there is no reason to prepare ²⁴⁷Cm (Pure sample of ^244,245,248Cm can be obtained easier).

Only ^210mBi, ²³⁶U, and ²³⁷Np remain. ²³⁶U is a nuisance from failed ²³⁵U fission, while ²³⁷Np is the only reasonable isotope of neptunium that can be produced, so both of them are produced in large amounts. ^210mBi however, doesn't have applications and is ignored despite can be easily made from bombarding thermal neutrons to ²⁰⁹Bi. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.025802) Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice summary, thanks! :) 129.104.241.181 (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an unrealistic imagination: Can we have ¹⁰⁰Mo(⁴⁸Ca,2n)¹⁴⁶Sm and ¹⁰⁴Ru(⁴⁸Ca,2n)¹⁵⁰Gd? (I was thinking about synthesising ¹⁴⁸Gd which would have its use in radiation power generating like ²³⁸U, were it easier to be produced). 2A04:CEC0:1934:7C54:2166:A111:3DF:A7F8 (talk) 17:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Neptunium 219

234Np: Spin 0+?

Contradictions regarding Np-237

237Np is an interesting nuclide

²³⁴Np: Spin 0+?

²³⁷Np is an interesting nuclide