Jump to content

Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleItalian cruiser Pietro Micca has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starItalian cruiser Pietro Micca is part of the Torpedo cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2016Good article nomineeListed
August 6, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well-written:
  • The article complies with MOS policies on grammar/wording, as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • The article cites several reputable publications. There are no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article seems to cover all relevant information for which reliable sourcing could be found. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Since its creation back in June this year, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • On this part, passed as non-applicable at present. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    The article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]