Jump to content

Talk:Iterative design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article merged: See old talk-page here

Untitled

[edit]

I removed the December 2005 Cleanup tag after fixing the case of the headings by putting them into sentence case and doing some minor copyediting, since it was basically a good article. It may be a little heavy on the number of headings, but I think they will fill out nicely since they all make sense and will add to the subject. I filled in the one on iteration in law. Spalding 11:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yl1665.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup notice

[edit]

I've just (re-)added a cleanup notice to this article. It's in desperate need of citations, external links, conforming to wiki style, and attention to some pretty horrific writing. The problems are, specifically (but not limited to these below):

  • The recurring phrases, "let us consider..." and "how, for example...", are particularly awful and need to be written to conform to a more encyclopedic style.
  • The headings are excessive and probably can be condensed into subheads under something like "Examples of iterative design".
  • Most importantly, there is no support for anything claimed in this article. Please provide citations and external links from established, reliable sources.

--C-squared 17:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG this article sucks. The worst article i've seen on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by XU-engineer (talkcontribs) 22:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed this article needs a LOT of work. Besides what's been mentioned, another area that needs attention is the use of many examples to illustrate a point without actually stating what the point is.War (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I suggest merging Marshmallow Challenge into this article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Iterative design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]