Talk:Iwasawa group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The definitions and equivalences in this article need some sorting out... at least in my brain, LOL. 86.127.138.67 (talk) 23:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, the def from Ballester-Bolinches et al., i.e. Iwasawa=all-subgroups-permutable clearly implies the other/first def, i.e. all subgroups are modular elements in the lattice of subgroups. But does the converse hold? It seems not since B-B et al. only say that "all nilpotent groups with a modular subgroup lattice are Iwasawa". So this page seems to operate with two non-equivalent definitions... Some1Redirects4You (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schmidt defines M-groups as being those that have a modular lattice. Some1Redirects4You (talk) 09:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]