Talk:Jabiluka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutral Point of View[edit]

This article deals not at all with Jabiluka itself, just a brief summary of the disputes over mining the deposit. While this is an important aspect to highlight, there is more to the deopsit than this. Turgan (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

This article is short and in need of expansion with information related to the geology, deposit, history, location, etc. Turgan (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing tags[edit]

I am removing the two tags; if there is something you wish to add to the article, please do so. Johnfos (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced both tags, as neither issue is resolved. Please leave them in place for a while to give myself and others a chance to notice and add some relevant information. Hopefully we can get back to it in less than 6 months this time. Thanks, Turgan Talk 08:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Main picture title is wrong[edit]

The main picture showing the total retention pond at Jabiluka is wrongly titled as Ranger 3. This is incorrect as it is not part of the Ranger Lease and is a separate development. It is the Jabiluka mine on the Jabiluka Lease and should be labelled as such. The EPBC copyright conditions do not apply either as the Jabiluka Lease is not part of Kakadu Naional Park.

   Djapa Owen 21:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djapa84 (talkcontribs)  

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jabiluka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jabiluka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]