Jump to content

Talk:Jackie Clune

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RC?

[edit]

"She identifies as straight and RC" - what does RC mean? Captain Chaos (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Roman Catholic. --Auric (talk) 15:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction about age

[edit]

Maybe nit-picking, but for what it's worth:

The first source [1] mentions that she was born 13 December 1965. However in the second source [2] Jackie Clune mentions "Then in 2000, when I was 33" even though if born i 1965 she wasn't 33 years in 2000 (but 34 before her birthday in 2000 and 35 after). --Penguin (talk) 23:49, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point! There's been a lot of anon-editing by what I suspect is "someone close to Ms Clone." I suspect the thruth is out there, and probably the latest refs reflect the accurate age. I will go have a look. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is useful to some extent to have a biography of sorts about the performer Ms Clune on Wikipedia as there is so much diverse information out there on the Web and the order of data can be confusing. She is aware of the site but is not obliged to correct personal and career information. Apologies for any inaccuracies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.82.141.169 (talk) 10:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be incorrect. "Actually I have never thought of myself as bisexual. And I certainly don't now that I am married."[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.204.136 (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A quotation from that article:"It's not that I stopped liking men, just that I felt a relationship with a woman would be a richer experience."
It's not at all unusual for people to concentrate entirely on one sex at a time, and then alternate with another for a period of years, or even decades. It doesn't mean those other sexual experiences never happened; nor that the person isn't actually Bisexual, looking at the whole length of their life. Whether they identify as such, or not.
Nuttyskin (talk) 20:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jackie Clune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jackie Clune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]