Talk:Jaishankar Bhojak

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

India: Gujarat Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

regarding Bhokaj caste

Dear Nizil Shah,

Bhojak are Brahmins --- please see links [1] - The People of India By Herbert Risley, William Crooke and [2] The Tribes and Castes of Bombay, Volume 1 By Reginald E. Enthoven.

I do not know which ref you were referring when you reverted my edit saying Bhojak are performing caste as per refs. Both the refs linked by you mention nothing about the Bhojak caste/clan. Even if any ref. you may have seen mentions Bhojak as performing caste - that ref cannot be relied.

So I am reverting back with additional refs citations above as links.

I think considering their family history it should be better if one says in family which were traditionally working as performers.

Jethwarp (talk) 02:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jethwarp, sorry for late reply. Bhojak is Brahmin caste who are traditionally performers. Here Oxford Ref says the same for Jaishankar Bhojak. I added both things in article as a compromise, so no problems. Here it is important to say that he came from traditional performing family thats why I insist adding his family background. Hope you understand. Regards -Nizil (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bhojakas are indeed Brahmins. They have a long and complex history. Please see Samba Purana. In Gujarat and Rajasthan, the priests in Jain temples are often Bhojak, who are identifiable by their red dhoti. They have also traditionally performed in dramas about Maina Sundari whose story is encountered in the context of Siddhachakra. I think that is how they were introduced to performing.Malaiya (talk) 23:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jaishankar Bhojak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160331060603/http://www.sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/awardeeslist.htm to http://sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/awardeeslist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]