Talk:Jalaram Bapa

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: Gujarat Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Untitled

Please refer www.lohanaonline.com for more information on Jalaram Bapa. I will try to come back on this articale an add information on Jalaram Bapa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.251.46 (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sugestions Required

Mr Sampat, Kindly give some sugestions for improving the articale.so we can make this article proper. --202.91.136.4 04:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, we need to make sure that the article is based on known facts and not on legend. There is quite a bit of legend surrounding Jalaram's life, but we can't include that information in the article unless it has been cited by reliable sources. Along the same lines, we need to ensure that the article adheres strictly to Wikipedia's NPOV policy, so any references to his "greatness" and such will need to be removed. At the same time, it is important to describe how important he is as a saint to Hindus, especially in Gujarat. The idea, thus, is to present facts in an emotionally detached manner. --Hnsampat 11:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This article is a good start on the topic of the Gujarati saint Jalaram, but it is poorly written. It is unorganized and does not have the tone of an encyclopedia article. Also, the information presented within it needs to be verified and sourced, to ensure factual accuracy and neutrality and to prevent self-contradiction. (Right now, the article says Jalaram was born in 1800 and died in 1937, meaning that he lived to be 137, a good 15 years older than the current recordholder. If that's the case, we need proof of some kind.) The article is also in dire need of copy-editing to fix its grammar, spelling, and other formatting errors. Once all that is done, it needs to be wikified. --Hnsampat 19:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total rewrite

Okay, this article's gone from bad to worse. It is still panegyrically POV, totally unsourced, and in need of massive copyediting. I've tagged this article for a total rewrite. The subject of this article is quite notable for millions of Hindus, but the article itself is a total mess. --Hnsampat 15:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jalaram to Jalaram Bapa

I have moved name back again from Jalaram to Jalaram Bapa : Firstly because Jalaram Bapa is widely used name and searched for in internet. Further, Hnsampat had reverted the name back to Jalaram citing moved Jalaram Bapa to Jalaram over redirect: "Jalaram Bapa" is an honorific. See WP:NCP) But Bapa is not honorific Mr Sampat if that rather is commonly used word for any elderly person. Further, if that is the case than Chaitanya Mahaprabhu should be renamed only Chaitanya, Bhaktaraj Maharaj only to Bhaktraj, Tukdoji Maharaj to only Tukdo, Swami Sri Lilashahji Maharaj to only Lilashah, Sai Baba of Shirdi to only Sai, etc. etc. So, please give good explanation before reverting back Jalaram Bapa to Jalaram, if you wish to do so in future. R P Jethwa (talk) 06:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You say that "Bapa" is not an honorific and then say that it is a commonly used word for any elderly person. That, by definition, makes it an honorific. Now, you do have a point with the examples you give about Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and Sai Baba, but I think a case can be made for renaming the former simply to "Chaitanya" (not so much the case for Sai Baba since he's almost never referred to as "Sai" alone, unlike Jalaram Bapa, who is frequently referred to as simply "Jalaram"). I'll open it up to the community and see what the consensus is. --Hnsampat (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is good to see a healthy discussion on this issue. But my contention is same as said previously. Sai Baba is often called Sai in many Bhajans, similarly you have avoided discussion on other Hindu saints where Maharaj is used, which is honorific and so is ji added to any name or Swami and Baba. Baba also means an elderly person. The idea here is not weather it is honorific but by what name the saints are generally called today. For example Sai Baba is more easily identifiable than Sai, similarly for Chaitanya Mahaprabhu than Chaitanya and so is the case for Jalaram Bapa rather than only Jalaram R P Jethwa (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, if that is the case than in Morari Bapu word Bapu is same as Bapa : meaning elderly person but simply for that reason we cannot change name to only Morari : R P Jethwa (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see this discussion concluded, but still the article name is just Jalaram, why is it so? Why is it not Jalaram Bapa? R P Jethwa has provided some valid arguments, all the other articles he stated still exist with their (arguably) honorific prefix or suffix, why this article does not have Bapa?-- Dhaval^Talk 09:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No one responded here, I have moved page to Jalaram Bapa. Please refer to Mother Teresa, Father Damien, Sathya Sai Baba, Swami Virajananda, etc. If Mother, Father, Baba, Swami, etc. are not honorific there, how is 'Bapa' honorific here? Please do not rename page without having discussion here.-- Dhaval^Talk 15:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section, photos

I have added back removed lines, the photo, which have been deleted by Users like User Kbir (Hnsampat) and SQGibbon [1] and also added back lines giving inline citation from books. I wonder, how one can remove photo ( and mention in edit summary Appears to be a copyright violation..). I request to start discussion of Talk page before reverting any citations.Jethwarp (talk) 13:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jalaram Bapa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120723170403/http://www.techfp.com/news/jalaram-bapa-no-donations-prays-jalaram-bapa-temple to http://www.techfp.com/news/jalaram-bapa-no-donations-prays-jalaram-bapa-temple

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://santjalaram.in/the-first-miracle. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 11:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]