Talk:James Graham (British Army soldier)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJames Graham (British Army soldier) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 4, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 18, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Sergeant James Graham was declared the "bravest man at Waterloo" for closing the North Gate at Hougoumont, an act which Wellington claimed saved the battle?
Current status: Good article

Article?[edit]

He? Its not an article. Please be serious. --Ironhoof (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting there. Just the framework outlined so I can slot in the rest; I've 3 or 4 books and several web links, so give me time. Gwinva (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

These might warrant further investigation:

Some more:

Gwinva (talk) 03:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mil Hist assesment[edit]

The article looks pretty good for a start, congratulations. First, I fixed the French and replaced it with British, that was my mistake, wasn't paying attention. Soldiers are listed tagged by the country(ies) they served, not where they fought. Second, I marked supporting materials because it needs a picture or portrait of him (or a grave if there aren't any of him). For the moment this is not a top priotiry since the infobox is there, you can sqeek by for a bit. As for the referencing and citation, I marked it because I know the article needs expanding. Personally, I do not like marking referencing and citation as complete unless the article is meets criteria two and three first (personal preference) because the changing length of the article means it will need more and better citations. Feel free to leave any further comments on my talk page, and if you'd like me to reassess the article at any time, just let me know there. Keep up the good work. Cromdog (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that all makes sense. I'll keep plugging away. There is a portrait at the Irish Galleries which I saw on one site (but can't find it now). Have to hope someone Irish comes along for a grave shot! Gwinva (talk) 23:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you should put a notice at WikiProject Ireland asking for picture of the grave, and ask if the portrait at the Irish Galleries is in the public domain or not? Cromdog (talk) 00:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. Have done so. Gwinva (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures/Details wanted[edit]

  • If you're in Ireland:

Sources say Graham was born at "Cloona", County Monaghan, which I think is probably Clones. Certainly, an unciteable blog mentions he's from Drummelly. (b 1791). It would be great to get some photos or pictures, of gravestones/plaques etc, plus confirmation of his birth, if there was anyone here willing to take up the challenge. There's a watercolour portrait of him at the National Gallery of Ireland, if anyone can discover if it's in the public domain. He died at Royal Hospital, Kilmainham on 23 or 28 April 1845, had a military funeral and is prob buried nearby. The bloggy site also mentioned there was a memorial plaque at the hospital which was transferred to St Tiernach's Church in Clones. If anyone local to any of those places could investigate/grab photos I would be greatly in your debt.

  • If you're a Napoleonic-era enthusiast:

I've got pretty much as far as I can with the resources available to me, so I was wondering if anyone has anything more to add. What would be great, too, is Robert Gibb's famous painting of the gates being shut. I've seen it replicated on dozens of sites, but am not sure how to discover the copyright status. He also, apparently, was awarded a special gallantry medal (which one source speculated would have been a VC if they'd been invented). Any ideas what that would be, and whether it's anything official? Thanks, Gwinva (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes and other notes[edit]

"The French failing in their endeavours to push in the gate, a brave grenadier volunteered to climb over and open it from the inside. Captain Wyndham, on perceiving the latter at the top of the gate, instantly desired Serjeant Graham, whose musket he was holding whilst the latter was bringing forward another piece of timber, to drop the wood, take his firelock, and shoot the intruder. The order was instantly obeyed; and the intrepid assailant [...] fell beneath Graham's deadly aim. - Captain William Siborne[1]

"Roaring at his officers to follow him, Macdonnell launched himself across the courtyard...For an instant the French were scattered; and while a couple of ensigns and two sergeants held them at bay, Macdonnell and Sergeant Graham set their shoulders to the double doors, and forced them together, the sweat pouring down their faces and the muscles standing out like corrugations down their powerful thighs. Yells of fury sounded outside, as Graham, while his colonel held the doors together against every effort of the sapeurs to force them open, slammed the great iron crossbar into position." - Georgette Heyer, An Infamous Army[2]

Perhaps some use can be made of these:

Booth, p 86:

The Duke then said, ' It is generally thought that the battle

of Waterloo was one of the greatest battles ever fought : such is not my opinion, but I say nothing upon that head. The success of the battle of Waterloo, however, turned upon the closing of the gates of Hougoumont. These gates were closed in the most courageous manner, at the very nick of time, by the effort of Sir James Macdonnel. I cannot help thinking, therefore, that Sir James is the man to whom you should give the £500.' " Sir James Macdonnel was applied to : he listened to the story of the executors, expressed his thanks to the great hero for his award, but said, ' I cannot claim all the merit due to the closing of the gates of Hongoumont ; for Serjeant John Graham, who saw with me the importance of the step, rushed forward, and together WE shut the gates. What I should therefore propose is that the serjeant and myself divide the legacy between us.' The executors, delighted with the proposal, adopted it at once, and Serjeant Graham was rewarded with hie share of the £500. "

An interesting aside: http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=qVUBAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA72&dq=%22Waterloo+Medal%22++Fraser&lr=#PPA71,M1 discusses the £500 gift, claiming it Macdonnel and Sergeant Fraser, and that neither Macdonnel nor Fraser saw the money it suggests it never existed, and the whole story became mixed up from the annuity story! The DNB certainly does not mention it, of Graham or Macdonnell. Siborne doesn't mention the £500 despite having spoken to Graham personally: http://books.google.com/books?id=WIaa967vOTcC&pg=PR16&vq=Graham&source=gbs_search_r&cad=0_2&sig=0WwN-0sGpyrqrRUeysdjFQPzkxI Worth presenting, anyway. Gwinva (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC) I've added one quote box to the article to see how it goes, but I don't think there's room for this one. But it adds a new dimension about Graham. Gwinva (talk) 01:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Siborne, p 239
  2. ^ Heyer, Georgette An Infamous Army, 1937 (repub. London:Arrow Books, 2004, p. 338)

GA-Passed[edit]

Good job with the GA. Only thing that I would suggest is that you might want to see if you could find any pics. of him. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 19:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

I liked the article a lot, but there is a problem with some of the citations. See my how to guide below for more information.--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The internet inline citations used in this article are improperly formatted. Internet citations require at the very least information on the title, publisher and last access date of any webpages used. If the source is a news article then the date of publication and the author are also important. This information is useful because it allows a reader to a) rapidly identify a source's origin b) ascertain the reliability of that source and c) find other copies of the source should the website that hosts it become unavaliable for any reason. It may also in some circumstances aid in determining the existance or status of potential copyright infringments. Finally, it looks much tidier, making the article appear more professional. There are various ways in which this information can be represented in the citation, listed at length at Wikipedia:Citing sources. The simplest way of doing this however is in the following format:

<ref>{{cite web|(insert URL)|title=|publisher=|work=|date=|author=|accessdate=}}</ref>

As an example:

  • <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.discovery.org/a/3859|title=Avoiding a Thirty Years War|publisher=www.discovery.org|work=[[The Washington Post]]|date=2006-12-21|author=Richard W. Rahn|accessdate=2008-05-25}}</ref>

which looks like:

  • Richard W. Rahn (2006-12-21). "Avoiding a Thirty Years War". The Washington Post. www.discovery.org. Retrieved 2008-05-25.

If any information is unknown then simply omit it, but title, publisher and last access dates are always required. I strongly recommend that all internet inline references in this article be formatted properly, this is something that the reviewer should have insisted on before promoting the article. If you have any further questions please contact me and as mentioned above, more information on this issue can be found at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Graham (British Army soldier). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Graham (British Army soldier). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]