Talk:James Griffiths

Proposed merger

Just noticed that two pages exist covering James/Jim Griffiths (James Griffiths and Jim Griffiths). They obviously should be merged unless there is some objection I have not anticipated. However, I do not know the subject and so am unclear by which name (James or Jim) the article should be titled.

If anyone is familiar with these pages/the subject please go ahead and merge. If not, and there are no objections, I'll try and muddle thru my first merger/redirect in a few days time.

Thanks! Sassf (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected this article to Jim Griffiths. Since he was known as Jim, that is the correct title for the article, and everything in the stub article at James Griffiths was already covered in greater detail in the Jim Griffiths article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]