Jump to content

Talk:James House (singer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James House (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 June 2024[edit]

– The only other entities with the exact name "James House" are James House (Rogers, Arkansas) and James House (Pensacola, Florida), which both have less than one page view per day. The singer has over 25. Everything else on the dab page James House except for the singer's album is a partial title match with at least one word other than "James House" in the title. From this evidence, it's abundantly clear that the singer is by far the most common result for people looking for the exact name "James House", and should therefore be the primary topic. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This distinction of exact name vs partial title matches is odd. If any of these places aren't actually known as James House, why are they even listed there? Conversely, if the places are known to our readers as such, why would we not include them as legitimate topics in the discussion of this ambiguity?
Let's apply the fine WP:DPT guideline and have a look at the usage aspect. Here's what I found in the page views: all-time monthly page views for the disambiguation page and the singer, all-time mass views of all items linked from the list and in the clickstreams:
clickstreams snapshot

From the meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream archive:

clickstream-enwiki-2017-11.tsv:
  • James_House James_House_(singer) link 18
  • total: 18 to 1 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2020-11.tsv:
  • James_House James_House_(singer) link 11
  • total: 11 to 1 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2022-05.tsv:
  • James_House James_House_(singer) link 11
  • total: 11 to 1 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-07.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-08.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-09.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-10.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-11.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2023-12.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2024-01.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2024-02.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2024-03.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2024-04.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
clickstream-enwiki-2024-05.tsv:
  • total: to 0 identified destinations
So, the singer's article gets some viewership, but it's not particularly significant (the page about the architects of one of those James Houses gets five times as many readers on average), and it's not clear how it's particularly larger than the viewership of the other items - its 20/day is hard to compare with various indices (where not nearly all the traffic is just for a James House listed there). The viewership of the James House disambiguation page is so small that it's been hard for our system to identify clickstreams from it, it likely gets largely anonymized (no data points in the last year). If we compare the numbers for the few months from earlier years I happened to have, in May '22 it was 11 clickstreams with 21 views (~52%); in November '20 11 over 19 (~58%), and in November '17 18 over 28 (~64%). Some sources and destinations might have been anonymized there, too, which might mean it was really something like 80 or 90% where a primary topic by usage could be assumed, but we can't actually know that. It would be worth an experiment, though.
Continuing with the WP:DPT guideline, we should consider the long-term significance of all of the relevant items. As there is no discussion of that at all in the discussion above, I will default to saying oppose. (Please feel free to apply the guideline completely and ping me afterwards if it should be reconsidered.) --Joy (talk) 21:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "If any of these places aren't actually known as James House, why are they even listed there?", I agree completely and have cleaned up the page so that all the entries not clearly called James House are now in a See Also section. I haven't bothered to look at each one of those to see if they are ever called James House, so have not deleted them completely from the page, but if anyone wants to delete any or all, I have no objection. Station1 (talk) 22:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]