This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Given the sexual abuse convictions, I don't think "philanthropist" is an accurate description to distinguish this James Wallace from others. Perhaps "businessman"? HenryCrun15 (talk) 02:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It doesn't even disambiguate that well (see James Wallace (benefactor)). I think I'm just going to go ahead and boldly move the page, but if anyone disagrees we can obviously discuss it further here. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I support bold moves when they make good sense, and this one does! Schwede66 05:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
