Talk:Jamie Bartlett

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Africa: South Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as Low-importance).

AfroCreatives

This article is within the scope of WikiProject AfroCreatives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of AfroCreatives articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfroCreativesWikipedia:WikiProject AfroCreativesTemplate:WikiProject AfroCreativesAfroCreatives articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge

Notability Flag

While this person (assuming the statements made are correct) is notable, the statements made that 'establish' this notability are currently unsourced, and the sources that are used are mainly 'primary' (specifically, interviews, which are not 'reliable sources'). While IMDB /can/ be used as a source for acting credits, it is 'preferable' that other sources be used for this purpose, as IMDB has no 'editorial oversight'.

As it currently stands, this article is eligible for speedy deletion, but as it is obviously a 'work in progress' I am not going to mark it for CSD at this time, but instead allow for possible improvement. (Only because the article does not make any controversial statements) This is in no way binding on other editors, though, and I would not be at all surprised if it is soon deleted unless at least some reliable sources are added.

This article should not have been created in this way....it is 'inappropriate' to put a 'work in progress BLP like this in mainspace.

Also, I feel obligated to note that the author of this article, in this [1] edit to his talk page, 'implied' a possible conflict of interest with the subject of this article, as well as the possible usage of the account by multiple editors. Revent (talk) 10:38, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]