Talk:Jamie Rappaport Clark

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assertion of Defamatory content

@WolvesandWhales, before removing the content. Can you explain and provide reasonable justification of it being libelous? It's reliably sourced. Philipnelson99 (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having a citation does not make something reliably sourced. WolvesandWhales (talk) 23:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources notes that both sources are reliable. The onus is on you to establish why that is not true and form consensus before removing the material from the article. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will put together all of the information as to why the information is both contentious and not well sourced. Please stay tuned. Thank you for providing this remarkably important internet vigilante service... WolvesandWhales (talk) 23:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]