Talk:Jan Willem Spruyt

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jan Willem Spruyt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Jan Willem Spruyt has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2008	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
June 1, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jan Willem Spruyt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

A nonfree image could be rationalised, if you have one.
- Unfortunately as yet no image has been found for Spruyt.
Break the first paragraph into more than one sentence please...
- Done.
"Most of his life he practised as law agent in private practice in both Boer republics, however." - this reads awkwardly, especially at the end of a paragraph... can you reword it?
- Done.
The link to Oosterwolde is a dab page.
- Changed.
"Later Spruyt did act as State President" - "acted" might sound better than "did act"
- Changed.
Some of these subsections are really short, not sure if they're really necessary...
- Changed.
"He he was allowed" - typo?
- Corrected.

Photo available from ^[1]: information on the page has been corroborated by Kathleen May Landskroon Morrison, granddaughter of Jan Willem Spruyt through Catherine Jane Landskroon Spruyt her mother and youngest daughter of Jan Willem Spruyt. I was told by Kathleen May Landskroon Morrison (my aunt) that two of the brothers fought in the second South African War (Boer War) on opposite sides. I have no other evidence of this internal family conflict. H C Morrison (talk) 06:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Please leave a note on my talk page when you're done with these comments. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All looks good, so passed. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive review and elevation to GA status! Michel Doortmont (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jan Willem Spruyt/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

===Assessment comments===

Assessment comments for this article can be found on the peer review page at WikiProject Biography. Michel Doortmont (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

===GA-status assessment & 2nd opinion request=== GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Makeshift Thackery (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

^ http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Jan_Willem_Spruyt

[1] ttp://www.wikiwand.com/en/Jan_Willem_Spruyt

[1]