Talk:Jana Bennett/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


"linguistically Challenged"[edit]

Here, from I o S 14:10:07, is a recent example of Jana's inability to express herself "Now that it's clear the conversation genuinely can be a creative two-way process, and in many cases multi-way, we are witnessing the possibilities opened up when many ripples bump against one another... we have the opportunity more than ever before to willingly seed the clouds of creativity and see a creative rainfall."

77.97.161.230 21:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)mikeL[reply]


"Reason for update"[edit]

5 November 2010. Page given extensive edit because of former stub status and lack of detail. KamTarwin (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further amendments, references and clarifications[edit]

Added 15 November 2010.KamTarwin (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like a press release.[edit]

I'm sorry but this Wikipedia biography of Jana Bennett reads like a press release. I notice lots of praises through out the article. Also, anytime Bennett is mentioned, the word she is used. This reads odd, like she wrote it herself,or someone with a connection to Jana Bennett wrote the article. Most articles will use the persons last name when stating a fact. All I see in the article is she,she she she. She did this, she did that. Also I noticed that one editor KamTarwin, seems awfully interested in Jana Bennett. Also odd is that KamTarwin ONLY edits the Jana Bennett aricle on Wikipedia. KamTarwin has never contributed to any other article or subject on Wikipedia. 174.49.11.185 (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jana Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jana Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]